Skip to content

The Tunit, Lost People of the North

February 4, 2009

That night had the news come of Daikos’ fall, and of the advance of the Inutos; squat, hellish, yellow fiends who five years ago appeared out of the unknown west to ravage the confines of our kingdom, and finally to besiege our towns. — “Polaris“, H.P. Lovecraft

It didn’t happen like that, even putting aside Lovecraft’s typical-for-his-era xenophobia, but walk the pebbly beaches of Arctic Canada and you’ll find artifacts. With little rain-driven erosion and next to no vegetation, they’re plain to see even if they’re hundreds of years old. Most belong to the Inuit, but some are more darkly patinated with age than them, different in size, materials, and decorative tradition. They were a mystery until after World War II when the Arctic north (not just in Canada, but in Alaska and Greenland too) was opened up by aircraft and worries about Russian ballistic missiles coming over the pole. Since then archaeologists have pieced together the story of the Tunit, the vanished people who were the first to learn how to live in one of Earth’s most forbidding lands.

The first hints that there was once an ancient culture in Canada’s north came from the Inuit who have replaced them. Until modern times they used boulder weirs and caribou channels for hunting, and Inuit folklore says they’d been build built another people whom they called the Tunit. The Tunit themselves appeared in some stories, peaceful giants who would interact with the Inuit for a while before leaving or being driven away into the icy wilderness. Many cultures have stories of the people who come before them; the Irish have their Fir Bolg and Tuatha Dé Danann, the Hawaiians their Menehune. In the particular case of the Inuit, though, the region’s older artifacts suggested there might be something to the story.

The Inuit’s predecessors were definitively proven to be something other than their own ancestors by discoveries at Independence Fjord, in the far northeast corner of Greenland at more than 80°N. The Inuit are known to have migrated into the area sometime around 1300 AD; these remains were nearly 4,000 years older. Descriptions of Independence Fjord’s vanished settlers were first published in 1911, and in 1925 Diamond Jenness proposed an earlier culture in the area of Cape Dorset on Baffin Island, but the post-WWII boom led to other discoveries further west that connected the two and revealed the history of the Tunit.

Like other native Americans, the Tunit originated in northeast Asia, though they crossed to the Americas long after the two previous bursts of colonization that had filled the continents from Tierra del Fuego to the tree line of Hudson Bay and the Northwest Territories. The high latitude parts of North America were uninhabitable without the right technology, and it was people on the Siberian coast of the Chukchi Sea who first developed it about 3000 BC. Among several other innovations they had the bow and arrow—which didn’t arrive in northeast Asia until after the previous sets of people to colonize the Americas had already left. There’s actually a distinct chance that it was the proto-Tunit who introduced the bow to all other people in the Americas. The early Tunit began interacting with the Maritime Archaic culture of Labrador around 2000 BC, and North American evidence of bows tends to get younger as one moves away from the northeast. Proponents of the opposing theory that the bow was independently invented in the New World point to the afore-mentioned kindness of Arctic environments to artifacts, though, and believe that the oldest bows are only found in the northeast because that’s where wood won’t decay over time.

Regardless of what happened, armed with their Asian bows the proto-Tunit could live in the far North hunting muskox. Though they were the first people to successfully colonize the Canadian Arctic and Greenland, their life was precarious. One estimate is that there were just two to six thousand people north of the tree line in Canada and Greenland—an area roughly the size of Western Europe.

The “true” Tunit encountered by the Inuit developed from these people. Starting around the 20th century BC, the Canadian Arctic (as well as much of the North Atlantic region) started getting colder and drier. The temperature rebounded for a little while at mid-millennium, but dipped again around 1000 BC. For agricultural communities this was a disaster, and for the proto-Tunit it was too—at least at first. Marginal settlements like Independence Fjord were abandoned, and artifacts from that time are only found in areas that were relatively rich and protected from the weather. But over the centuries the Tunit developed techniques for hunting on the extended sea ice that now surrounded their homes. Most notably, they stopped making bows and focused on harpoons for attacking sea mammals—though it’s an open question whether this was a case of deliberate abandonment or if it was, in a population possibly as low as 1000 at its nadir, due to the accidental extinction of the few who could make them.

The interface between sea and ice is rich in wildlife when compared to open arctic water, and the new skills and equipment the Tunit developed actually increased their population despite the climate taking a turn for the worse. By 900 BC the last pre-Inuit people, what archaeologists call the Dorset Culture, had developed. They built sod and stone longhouses (the remains of which greatly confused and excited archaeologists of the late 19th century who were looking for Viking colonies), and started a mini-Iron Age based entirely on chips off the Cape York Meteorite. There’s even a little bit of evidence that they traded with the Greenlandic Norse—small pieces of smelted copper (as opposed to native copper from the Coppermine River) have been found in two widely separated Dorset sites.

Then the climate changed again and another people came from the west. The Inuit seem to have developed on the south coast of Alaska, where they learned how to hunt whales in open waters. From there they gradually worked their way to the Alaskan North Slope as well as the arctic side of the Chukchi Peninsula in Siberia. When the Medieval Warm Period began, the solid coastal ice on which the Tunit depended melted into open waters that favored Inuit hunting methods. On top of that, the Alaskan Inuit had the advantage of being connected to the cultures of Siberia. They could trade for iron, they had composite bows (and so better than even the ones abandoned by the Tunit), and they had slat armor of wood and bone made on an Asian model. Worse, they came from where there was some contact between the Old World and the New, so they may have brought one or two Eurasian diseases with them. It wouldn’t have produced the persistent epidemics of post-Columbian times, but the Tunit were few and close to the brink even when things were good. The Inuit exploded eastward, colonizing over a hundred degrees of longitude—some three thousand kilometers—in just five hundred years.

Dorset Culture archaeological sites disappear by about 1500, which is not coincidentally the time when the Inuit reached their easternmost limits in Greenland. Even so, the Tunit may not have disappeared entirely until the beginning of the 20th century. In 1824 the HMS Griper, one of the British ships assigned to exploring the Northwest Passage, came across a group of natives on the islands straddling Fisher Strait at the head of Hudson Bay. These Sagdlirmiut, as they were called, were different in language and hunting technique from most Inuit. They were just a curiosity until the Dorset Culture was recognized, but by then it was too late to study them properly–the last of them had died from influenza in the winter of 1902-1903. There’s enough left of their physical remains, though, to examine their mitochondrial DNA, as well as that of older Dorset bodies and the genetically distinctive modern Inuit. A 2001 study suggests that the Sagdlirmiut were an almost equal mix of the two peoples.

Advertisements
14 Comments leave one →
  1. Luce York permalink
    March 2, 2009 2:00 PM

    Very interesting information. I just finished reading Terminal Freeze, by Lincoln Child, in which an important character in the book is a Tunit.

    • pauldrye permalink*
      March 2, 2009 2:28 PM

      Yet another entry for my long List of Books to Read, it would seem.

  2. Corinne O'Hara-Johnston permalink
    April 13, 2009 2:48 PM

    I, too, just finished reading Terminal Freeze by Lincoln Child and while the book was not the greatest novel I have ever read, it did have its moments.

    I like to write a review of books I read and use information that I found interesting in the novels. I wrote my review about the book and looked up information about glaciers and icebergs just for fun.

    Then I tried to find information about the Tunit peoples and was surpised at how little information there is. What I did find on this website was really interesting and I wanted to express my appreciation for the information.

    • Patrick Petrillo permalink
      July 23, 2009 9:33 AM

      Is this the Corin O’Hara that went to RIT ten years ago? Trying to get in touch.

  3. April 30, 2009 8:28 PM

    Tunnit is the Sami people look at the hats http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sami_people http://www.geocities.com/yosemite/rapids/3330/hist.html

    • Paul Drye permalink*
      April 30, 2009 8:43 PM

      Probably not. Tunit seem to have been mtDNA haplotype D, while the Sami are a mix of type U and V.

      That’s actually quite distant, genetically speaking — something like 60,000 years is the current best theory as to how long ago they separated.

  4. May 1, 2009 10:16 AM

    This is a mt DNA analysis of chief Nonosabasut, and wife, Demasduit from Newfoundland. He was X2a, and she was C (Q-M3). I keep seeing Asia put down as the place of origin for X2a. Have I missed a paper? As far as I know X2 is limited to western Europe, the near east and the Saami.

    • Paul Drye permalink*
      May 1, 2009 4:43 PM

      Hmmm, I’m not sure what you’re asking. The Beothuk and the Tunit are unrelated. The ancestors of the former were neighbours of the latter along the Labrador Coast, but their heritages are quite different.

  5. Gökhan Peksoy permalink
    January 22, 2011 2:03 PM

    Hi friends. My grangrand…. parents came from vast plains of Siberia. Around all these regions Turkic people were living and they were known as good hunters and warriors. I hope scientists can find out who really these Tunit people? After a drought in Asia Turkic people travelled in all directions. As far as i know Hungary, Finland, Korea … same linguistic group (all related) I read all articles with pleasure. Thank you.

  6. tito permalink
    June 20, 2011 2:14 AM

    beautiful

  7. December 18, 2013 12:55 PM

    Hi, I do believe this is an excellent site. I stumbledupon it 😉 I will come back
    once again since i have bookmarked it. Money and freedom is the best way to change, may you be rich and continue to help other people.

  8. Paunguliaq TheWANDERER permalink
    December 14, 2014 2:37 PM

    HI Mr. Drye,
    I am very impressed with your site. I have not had time yet to read many of your posts, but I will be happy to buy your book. I appreciate your cogent description of the early colonization of the arctic. I am writing a book on the Inuit and found your work most helpful. I see the arctic Tunit are just a small part of your comprehensive view of the world.

    Best of luck Sir on your ambitious Opus.

  9. September 10, 2015 3:59 PM

    I just found out that I’m descended from the Paleo Eskimo Of Greenland. I ran my raw DNA data through an ancient DNA extractor utility. Great info! Thank you!

    • Paul Drye permalink*
      September 10, 2015 6:38 PM

      Glad it was interesting to you, Robin! That line of descent is certainly a point of distinction in the world — not many people can say what you can.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: